PRELUDE: Fredo Ratto, Former National News Correspondent at the Ostrich News Network (ONN)
Excerpt from "COVIDsteria: An Oral History of America's Great Reset" - see https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/covidsteria-table-of-contents
The Great Die-Off was a mass extinction event for the national corporate media as few journalists managed to survive - let alone survive with any credibility intact. However, most independent journalists, now known as citizen journalists or CJs, not only survived but are now thriving in the corporate media vacuum.
As the nightly face of the COVIDsteria years, former National Correspondent Fredo Ratto would only agree to meet me in private and in the undisclosed location where he now lives. I was more than happy to accommodate his wishes to have a chance to chat with him about the media.
When we met, I was shocked by Fredo's appearance without any TV makeup on. He looked at least 15 to 20 years older since I last saw him on TV during the Capitol Siege. He also had a bad cough and was sometimes out-of-breath during our conversation. More oddly and something I had never noticed before when I had seen him on TV: He waddled very much like a penguin when he walked and seemed to be uncomfortable when seated.
Nevertheless, Fredo was surprisingly chatty between his coughing fits about his media days. It was as if I was the first person to listen to him since his last broadcasts during that fateful Capitol Seige. However, he was adamant before we met about not wanting to talk about the Great Die-Off, the purges, and especially what might have happened to him at the end of COVID Spring...
I was born to be in media! Even my teachers and parents said the same! When I was in grammar school and inside the classroom, I always acted as the hall monitor. My teachers knew they could always rely on me to tell them who was doing what when they had their backs turned or left the classroom!
And I was a terror out on the schoolyard playground! At the beginning of recess, I could also start a rumor at the monkey bars. And by the time recess ended, there would be fighting going on all over the playground! With any luck, at least one kid and not me would get suspended! [He laughs and starts coughing and breathing heavily.]
Seriously speaking, journalism was so much different in the days before that stupid Fake News Executive Order and all the changes in libel laws! 1 2 And now we got you so-called citizen journalists running around without any direction reporting largely uncoordinated narratives! [He smirks and coughs heavily.]
Back in my day, editors, producers, and story sponsors often did not have the time to give us journalists full directions. It meant we had to know or have a good instinct on what direction the media herd was heading. And if you could not keep up with or if you kept misjudging where the media herd was stampeding to a few too many times, you did not last long in the media business!
We journalists always faced and were hunted by the tyranny of a 24-hour news cycle driven by social media. Our closest and dearest friends were the copy and paste keyboard commands and the Internet search engines and social media platforms where we looked for quotes from our sources.
In those days, a typical news story was written or produced like this: I was given a brief by my editor, producer, or story sponsor that was often vague or incomplete. Then I went on the Internet or social media to figure out where the media herd was or the direction they appeared to be heading on the story, topics, news, or issues. I also had to ensure that I got all the framing and labeling correct.
Then I had to think like a millennial to find a way to insert myself into the story – especially if the story was for millennials. Inserting myself in as if I was a millennial was the only way we journalists could ever get their damn attention!
Then all I needed to do was find the necessary sources or quotes either on or off social media. If I could not find some good sources or quotes, I could always make one up. I mean…! [He pauses to shift uncomfortably in his seat while letting out a hearty laugh and a lengthy cough while breathing heavily.] I could always say the source was anonymous! [He smiles.]
In the good old days of journalism, we always had this saying around every newsroom or news studio, “What difference does it make?” No one ever questioned our sources or our reporting! So long as everything advanced the correct narratives, our attitude in the media business was, “What difference does it make!”
Even for search and destroy pieces about someone or some group deemed socially or politically repugnant who might fight back – they could never sue us and win! American courts had long ruled that journalist sources are sacred or at least protected under the First Amendment, or the US Constitution, or some other old piece of paper. So again, what difference does it make?!!
I am not saying there were no landmines or booby traps you could still step on in the media business. Using the wrong pronouns to address somebody or accidentally tripping up someone on your side into revealing something that could not be easily edited out, especially on live TV, were the usual pitfalls. Those got you immediately shit-canned!
If that happened, you went into exile from the national mainstream media. You either had to grovel for a job in the news division at Coyote News, or worst: You had to move to some shitty flyover city that could not be located on a map to cover county fairs, mayor, or city council races, and the local sports scene! [He laughs.]
The real trick to being a good journalist in those days was to ensure your readers or viewers never had to do any thinking on their own. It was your job as a journalist to tell them what to think through the selected use of language, images, and videos. 3 And if your readers or viewers chose to do any heavy thinking on their own, it better not be them questioning anything you just told them! [He pauses to catch his breath and then coughs into his handkerchief and shifts uncomfortably in his seat.]
So long as you always kept up with the media herd, used the correct labels and framing, repeated all the right facts and opinions, and avoided stepping on any landmines – the media world was your oyster! It was the golden age of journalism and to be a national correspondent in Washington DC! 4 5 6 7 8
As a national correspondent in Washington DC, when did you first hear about COVIDsteria?
I first heard about COVIDsteria in early January of the first year of the pandemic. There had been a post and a discussion about it in our private social media group.
Private social media group? 9 10 11
Yes. During those days, most national correspondents and media people on the same team politically and not working for or exiled at the Coyote News Network had full access to a private social media group.
In the olden days of journalism, journalists got together bars at the end of the day or behind closed doors in private rooms after press conferences or news events. They would collectively decide what words or labels to use for the proper framing of the story. Because our editors or producers could not be in every bar or private room after every press conference or news event listening or contributing to our discussion, the labels and framing would often get muddled by them during the editing process.
The Internet changed all of that. Our group started as informal invitation-only listservs or email groups to help journalists, editors, producers, and trusted political operatives to coordinate or target stories, themes, or messages. We also nailed down the correct language, framing, and labels.
At the same time, we coordinated our targeted search and destroy pieces about particular people or groups we did not like. In that way, we avoided stepping on toes when doing such stories.
With the advent of social media, these listservs and email groups became a single invitation-only social media group moderated by the National Media Association (NMA) in Washington DC. Since all you had to do was look at the posts and discussion threads on the group to know where the media herd was stampeding, there were no more excuses for not following the media herd or getting the framing and labeling wrong.
Who wrote the first COVIDsteria social media group post, and what was in it?
As our China News Bureau member, Fun Fun wrote the first COVIDsteria post. Aside from working for the official Chinese news agency, I think she had good intelligence, Capitol Hill, and State Department contacts in Washington DC. She was always the first to know anything concerning US-China relations.
Fun Fun’s first COVIDsteria post contained a quick summary along with key talking points for the US media about a potential new form of SARS emerging out of Bianfucheng in China. She wrote how we needed to downplay it. Better yet, she wanted us to ignore the story as it was “absolutely nothing to worry about."
In the weeks that followed, Fun Fun wrote numerous posts or comments downplaying the virus. However, we in the American media turned all of her posts into discussion threads about how best to bait the President and his deranged flyover country supporters into calling it a Chinese virus. We also discussed how to talk up the virus to maximize ratings.
But poor Fun Fun got so angry and exasperated with all of us as she wanted the virus story downplayed or ignored! [He laughs.]
As the pandemic unfolded, how did the COVIDsteria posts and discussions on your private social media group evolve?
It evolved with the pandemic. At first, Fun Fun was our go-to COVIDsteria expert. She always posted helpful posts or comments in the discussion threads to assist us with our reporting, framing, and labeling. But then she suddenly disappeared for a while as I guess she went back to China before reappearing again to make numerous helpful posts or comments about nDNA vaccines as the Chinese had also developed one. Then she disappeared for a final time. I presume she had taken the Chinese nDNA vaccine and had succumbed during the Great Die-Off as we never heard from her again.
Otherwise, every COVIDsteria story or theme was discussed, debated, framed, labeled, and hashed out in discussion threads on our private social media group. Our group discussions led us to frame and label COVIDsteria as an airborne Ebola and a Black Death with some Spanish flu mixed in that required a great reset to contain. We also decided there were no treatments for COVIDsteria until you needed a hospital ventilator. [He coughs.]
When the new Administration, or rather Team Science, took over, they gave us clear directives. So we did not need to use the group as much anymore.
However and when we in the media began taking the nDNA vaccine, we would discuss all the coincidences we started suffering. We also discussed what framing and language to use that would best prepare the public for them. [He coughs longer and shifts uncomfortably in his seat while spiting something into a handkerchief.]
Did you take the nDNA vaccine?
We members of the media all had to take! We knew about the uncomfortable and slowly growing number of coincidences involving health problems, heart attacks, or deaths. Of course, this was before the Great Die-Off got underway when the rising death numbers could still easily be labeled a coincidence. [He coughs again.]
We in the media all believed that the number of coincidences was insignificant compared to the severity of the virus. In other words, we truly believed everything we were telling the public about COVIDsteria being an airborne Ebola and a Black Death with some Spanish flu mixed in! Since there were no treatments for COVIDsteria until you needed a hospital ventilator, only the nDNA vaccine and a great reset could stop it. So you better not blame survivors in the media like me for our reporting!
Even today, no one fully understands what happened and whether there might have been an issue with the vaccine or if it was the variant! And we sure as hell are not getting any answers from the President, or rather our new President Emeritus, or whatever he likes to call himself now! [He frowns.]
You also have to understand that everyone remotely connected to journalism was under enormous peer and social media pressure to show that we had all, at some point, taken that vaccine! We had to prove to our readers and viewers that the vaccine was perfectly safe, while the new variant on the loose at the start of the Great Die-Off was highly dangerous. So I do not understand why I… [He pauses to cough harder and breathes more heavily. He resumes talking in a voice that tapers off.] Why I survived, but nearly everyone else in the media profession did not. I mean, I always trusted science… [He shifts uncomfortably in his seat, takes deeper breaths, and a sad look appears on his face.]
Surber, Don (January 21, 2021). “Media Does Not Want Our Trust.” Donsurber.blogspot.com. (Archived 22 Jan 2021)
Surber, Don (October 11, 2019). “Media Doesn't Want Credibility.” Donsurber.blogspot.com. (Archived 24 Dec 2019)
Eisinger, Jesse (April 8, 2021). “So I've Been Thinking About Some Rules for Reporting.” Twitter. (Thread)
Greenwald, Glenn (February 8, 2021). "The Journalistic Tattletale and Censorship Industry Suffers Several Well-Deserved Blows (The NYT's Taylor Lorenz falsely accuses a tech investor of using a slur after spending months trying to infiltrate and monitor a new app that allows free conversation)." Greenwald.substack.com. (Archived 9 Feb 2021)
Hanson, Victor Davis (May 24, 2020). “The Doctrine of Media Untruth (When knowledge, wisdom, independent thought, even basic competence were no longer requisites for success, then the media naturally slid into mediocrity, and mastered networking and obsequiousness instead of valuing independence)." American Greatness. (Archived 26 May 2020)
Jeftovic, Mark E. (June 22, 2021). "Anything That Is Not Censored Is A Lie (Late Stage Globalism Is A Tale of Narratives vs Networks)." Bombthrower Media. (Archived 3 Jul 2021)
Tracey, Michael (April 15, 2021). “‘Activist’ Journalists Have Completely Taken Over the Media Industry.” Mtracey.substack.com. (Archived 14 Apr 2021)
Calderone, Michael (March 17, 2009). “Inside the Echo Chamber.” Politico. (Archived 1 Sep 2015)
Goldberg, Jeffrey (July 21, 2010). “Meet the New Journolist, Smaller Than the Old Journolist.” The Atlantic. (Archived 23 Jul 2010)
Taranto, James (Updated July 20, 2010). “'Call Them Racists': How ‘Journolists’ Tried to Suppress the News.” Wall Street Journal. (Archived 19 Feb 2015)